top of page
mockup-umatch.png
MOBILE APP

Subscription offer

DURATION

June - August 2023

COMPANY

Umatch

TOOLS USED

Figma

Miro

TEAM OF 4

PD: Aline Saruhashi

PM: Cayo Syllos

Front-end: André Navarro​

Back-end: Gabriel Okamoto

Overview

My role
 

As the principal Product Designer at Umatch, I led the UX initiative of this project from initial discovery to final implementation. My responsibilities were multifaceted, encompassing user research, design strategy, copywriting, prototyping, and collaboration with the development team to ensure a seamless user experience.

About Umatch
 

Launched in 2020, Umatch is a dating app designed for college students. With over 500,000 registered users and 120,000 monthly actives, Umatch operates on a subscription-based business model with two tiers: Plus and Premium.

Problem background
 

Our main goal for the third quarter of 2023 was boosting our users' Lifetime Value (LTV) by 20%. To meet this target, my PM and I focused on understanding the journey of our paying users.

Problem statement

How can we increase user-to-subscriber conversion to boost LTV?

Solution overview

We implemented a time-limited promotion, granting a 50% discount on our Plus subscription to two targeted groups: new subscribers and those who had previously canceled their plans.

This project increased LTV by over 10%, while maintaining subscription retention. 

filter-en.png

Filter additional banner

discovery-en.png

Main modal

unlock-en.png

Unlock additional banner

Discovery

Survey

Goal: Identify the primary factors behind the cancellation of subscriptions by users.

​

Method: We sent the survey to users who had subscribed and then canceled their subscription plans. We got 60 survey responses.

​

Key findings

Cost is the leading factor in subscription cancellations

52% of the participants canceled due to the price of the subscription plan.

Enhanced user experience for subscribers

Participants reported a fivefold better user experience when subscribed compared to their time as non-subscribers.

User interviews

Goal: Analyze the user journey of our subscribers to identify opportunities and pain points.

​

Method: We interviewed 10 users who who had subscribed and then canceled their subscription plans. We asked questions regarding the following stages of their journey:

Key findings

Interestingly, the interviews reaffirmed the two insights we captured in the survey and uncovered a new one related to the primary triggers for app subscriptions.

Cost is the leading factor in subscription cancellations

​"I've bought the plan to try it out, but I cannot justify this payment every month to my parents..."

Enhanced user experience for subscribers

"My experience in the app was a lot better as a subscriber. I spent more time in the app since I had unlimited swipes."

2 primary triggers for app subscriptions

Users cited the primary reasons for subscribing to the app as the desire to access exclusive benefits, specifically: 1) the ability to view all users who liked their profiles, and 2) have unlimited swipes with an applied filter.

1) See who liked you

NEWverquemtecurtiu.png

2) Filter

NEWfilter.png
Key hypotheses

After analyzing the research data, I came up with two key hypotheses: 

1. Reducing the subscription price, as cost is the main cancellation factor, may lead to increased purchases.

Success metric: LTV

2. Users who subscribe and experience the enhanced features are likely to retain their subscriptions.

Success metric: Subscription Retention

Benchmarking

Goal: Analyze the special offers and promotional strategies employed by our competitors, Bumble and Tinder.

Tinder

IMG_3317.PNG

Main modal

Bumble

IMG_3306 2.PNG

Main modal

IMG_3308 2.PNG

Additional banner

Key findings

1. Both Tinder and Bumble present a 24-hour, 50% discount on their subscription plans.

​

2. While Bumble extends this discount for the duration of an ongoing subscription, Tinder limits it to the first month of a subscription.

​

3. Bumble further emphasizes the visibility of their promotion with an additional banner within their "See who liked you" feature.

Definition & Ideation

Solution strategy

1. Offer a 24-hour, 50% discount on our Plus subscription plan to two user groups:

  • New usersAimed at individuals who have never subscribed to the app, this incentive is based on the hypothesis that a trial of the subscription features will encourage ongoing subscription.

  • Former subscribers: Aimed at individuals who have previously subscribed and then cancelled. The hypothesis is that re-engaging with the premium features at a reduced cost will motivate them to renew their subscription.

Wireframe

Iterations

Main modal

iteration1.png

2. Identify optimal locations within the app interface to prominently display the special offer, thereby enhancing the likelihood of user conversion.

Based on user feedback (See "Key takeaways" inside User Interviews) highlighting 'See Who Liked You' and 'Filter' as key subscription motivators, I have integrated promotional banners within these features to boost conversion rates.

Additional banners

unlock-en.png

See who liked you

filter-en.png

Filter

Usability test

Method: Tested an interactive prototype of the special offer flow with 5 users. 

Key findings

  • Main modal: Users didn't understand that the promotion was only valid for the first month of subscription.

    • Design implication: enhanced the visibility of this information in the main modal design.​

Before

iteration1.png

After

discovery-en2.png
  • Additional banner: Users thought that the additional banner was promoting a different offer, separate from the main modal promotion.

    • Design implication: changed the flow by introducing the main modal between the additional banner and the subscription purchase, clearly indicating that both elements are promoting the same offer.

Flow before

unlock-en.png
unlock-purchase.png

Flow after

unlock-en.png
discovery-en2.png
unlock-purchase.png

Final designs

discovery-en2.png
Main modal
unlock-en.png
Additional banners

See who liked you

filter-en.png

Filter

Interactive prototype

Interested in looking at the interactive prototype? ​

Send me an email so I can share it with you!

Results

Impact measurement

10% increase in LTV

By comparing May's LTV with August's, we achieved a 10% increase. Combined with early quarter deliveries, we saw a total LTV increase of 40%. This far exceeds our initial target of a 20% increase, marking a significant achievement for us

Stable subscription retention

Our restrictive metric, subscription retention, stayed consistent with May's figures. This supports our hypothesis: the offer motivated first-time subscribers to both sign up and continue their subscription, demonstrating the offer's effectiveness and its value to our users.

Reflection

Learnings

Integrating qualitative and quantitative insights

While quantitative data is typically prioritized in offer analysis, direct user feedback can unveil insights not apparent in numbers alone.

Clarity in communication is key

Feedback revealed a common misconception that the offered discount would apply indefinitely, while it was actually a one-month introductory offer. This underscores the importance of clear and transparent communication regarding offer details to prevent misunderstandings and enhance user experience.

Next steps

A/B test with the Discount Value

Conduct an A/B test offering a smaller discount to users who have previously subscribed. The goal is to test if a smaller discount for this group, who has already recognized the value of the subscription, maintains the conversion rate.

A/B test with the Discount Duration

Evaluate if a longer discount period of more than 48 hours increases the conversion rate by offering users a larger window to view and consider the offer.

A/B test with the Discount Copywriting

Conduct an A/B test to evaluate the effectiveness of different copywriting approaches on our offer modal. For example, compare the effectiveness of 'You won 50% off' against 'Don't miss out on 50% off' and analyze which generates a higher conversion rate.

bottom of page